 |
wind
turbines © William McKelvie |
| Features from Wildlife magazine |
|
|
|
|
|
The climate challenge
Tilting at windmills (and airports)
The Trust has always campaigned against developments
that will damage the natural environment. With growing threats and
pressures, that must continue, and with a louder voice – the
Trust has a duty to act. But drawing the line is sometimes difficult
– and getting harder. There are two basic truths: all human
development has an impact on the natural environment, and all human
technologies have their bad points no matter how ‘benign’
they may at first appear!
The Trust has recently had to confront two tricky
issues - proposals for local wind turbines, and the proposed expansion
of Bristol Airport. Here is a brief summary of the positions it
has adopted.
Wind turbines
There is an urgent need to reduce the UK’s heavy dependence
on fossil fuels and its carbon emissions. The Trust therefore strongly
supports moves to meet more of our energy needs from renewable sources,
including wind power. Wind turbines can bring a net overall benefit
to wildlife by reducing climate change, but they need to be carefully
sited to minimise the immediate impacts on local wildlife.
These impacts include: direct loss of habitat by construction of
the turbines and their infrastructure, changes to subsequent management
of the land affected, interference with natural processes (eg the
movement of sediments around off-shore structures), noise and other
pollution, direct disturbance to wildlife, and the risk of wildlife
collisions with blades and cabling. In particular there is a need
to avoid bird migration routes and known foraging areas for bats
and other species; and to consider the cumulative impact of several
turbines or wind farms in the same area. Avonmouth is currently
the focus for several wind-farm proposals.
Science does not yet have answers for all the
issues raised. In the meantime the Trust would expect those proposing
wind turbines to avoid areas of high conservation interest and undertake
very careful assessment of the potential environmental impacts.
Bristol International
Airport
There has recently been a public consultation on the Airport’s
Master Plan to expand capacity by the year 2030 from around 5m passengers
a year currently to around 12.5m.
Few would disagree that foreign travel can bring great benefits
to people. It can increase understanding of our ‘one planet’
and global issues, and bridge the gaps between cultures and ideologies;
and in recent years cheap air travel has brought the benefits to
more people than ever before. Yet air travel is now the fastest
increasing source of carbon emissions in the world and causes up
to 3 times more damage than normal emissions because most are at
high altitude.
The Trust recognises that Trust members use planes.
However, given the scale of threat to wildlife from climate change,
the Trust felt obliged to make clear its opposition in principle
to airport expansion. At the same time it has made clear that if
expansion does go ahead, the Trust also has objections to the design
of the proposed expansion – both because of loss of wildlife
habitat and increased disturbance/pollution, and because it places
great reliance on the expanded numbers of staff and passengers arriving
by car. The Airport site is close to wildlife sites of local, national
and international importance and the Trust has called for further
surveys and impact assessments on the species and habitats that
could be affected before North Somerset Council takes a decision,
so that the designs for any expansion can be modified to minimise
the damage to wildlife.
Want to know more or express
your views?
This is only a very brief summary of the Trust’s positions.
If you want to have a copy of the full responses, contact the Trust.
Do you agree with these responses? Do you think
the Trust is right to campaign on these controversial issues? Tell
us what you think – contact us at members@avonwildlifetrust.org.uk
|